This is the end, beautiful friend, the end ...
Please click on the picture, or the link and bookmark the page.
What are firms doing about the recession?
I suspect many are hiding under the bedclothes and hoping it'll go away. Or maybe they're like this deer.
I get this impression from one fact and one observation.
Is it politically incorrect to say this? I fear so.
I prefer women to men, always have.
They look nicer, are more entertaining and far more practical. They need to be, to cope with men.
It is probably even more politically incorrect to say I like Chinese women - but I do.
Before that gets me into further trouble I should explain this is nothing to do with sex. It is to do with personality.
Over the years I have worked with a few Chinese ladies. The first was Moy - back in 1958 in my first job in advertising. She was funny and charming in a way I can't quite describe, but she had a directness I loved.
The same applied to Alice, who worked for me about 15 years ago. I lost her because someone who also worked with me was a pain and lost me one or two good people including her - but Alice went on to do well. She too had this charm and directness.
But none could compare, as you will see, with Ling.
Yesterday somebody sent me to her site - http://www.lingscars.com/talks.php.
I was utterly transfixed. Especially when I saw a speech made by the master - is it OK to say mistress? - of that particular universe.
The site is the sort of thing that most marketers would find appalling.
It was voted one of the world's worst websites. But I bet that people spend ten times more time on it than they do on any site produced by people who think they are experts in building websites.
But none could compare, as you will see, if you go and watch Ling. This is 100% what you need when leasing cars. It is a living, moving example of a great car dealer's ad - but with the magic of Ling added.
The car marques build the brands: Ling shifts the metal. Great stuff.
Ling did very well on Dragon's Den, which I never watch as I see so many silly people on it. This is my favourite episode: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mmlx-e_u0i8.
Do you find it takes a depressing amount of time to get anything done?
And that even when you've done it, you're disappointed?
Me too.
It is now several months since I got fed up with the "improvements" made by Blogger to the way you put things up here. They were a perfect example of how big organisations change things - but make them worse.
Anyhow, I've finally managed it, and you will now find my ramblings on a revamped Draytonbird.com. You will also find all my past blogs.
My publisher suggested the other day that we might put together a collection of the best ones - but that sounds like a pretty daunting task.
To be honest I am not yet entirely happy with that site - there's a lot of type floating around vaguely at the top. But it is in Wordpress which makes life easier, so I hope to have it sorted out in the next few days.
There are a great many features that Im going to incorporate, one of which has been on my mind for over a year. It is a listing of all the books, videos, e-books and courses I have created.
There are so many that I gave up going through them a couple of weeks ago. Serves me right for being a motor-mouth.
***
Last week a young man I know in Montclair N.J. wrote asking for my advice.
He has a good idea, and approached it in the best way: he has done his research and found a business with several advantages.
I am not going to tell you what the business is, but it is nothing unusual. You can see this kind of business in every town, everywhere.
Most people who talk to me about going into business do so just because they like the idea. Hardly any do their homework. He has.
He has looked at the total U.S. market and how it is growing based on the statistics in Forbes magazine. He has looked at his local area and found there is unusually high demand for what he proposes to sell because of a particular ethnic group. And he has found cheap premises.
He is also very realistic, with a goal.
"It is also relatively cheap compared to other business and I don't plan for this to become a multi-million dollar business. Just something to make a smaller income over time but more so the experience needed to run a much larger business."
This is what I wrote to him:
This is not a bad idea at all and you have started off by doing an analysis, which is the right thing.
You must now do more of the same.
Take a note of and study all the successful retailers you can, both on and off-line.
Try to determine what they are doing that makes them succeed, both in terms of their general approach and in specific things they do.
Read any books you can that seem helpful. Also anything on the Internet to do with start-ups.
I do not mean the kind of "I'll make you rich in 20 minutes" garbage. I mean stuff by people who have been there and done it with serious business - Tony Hsieh of Zappos is an interesting case.
Try to define what it is about your business that will make it better (it does not have to be different - just better).
Write a plan that defines how you will be different and better.
Work out the numbers. Never underestimate how much gross profit you need.
Define your customers. Why will they buy? When will they buy? What emotions will make them buy? How can you make them buy again? Remember, the first sale is not the one that makes you money. How are you going to communicate with them?
Be a customer. Look at what other people are doing and finish the following sentence:
Why don't they .....? Then finish it with something you think people could and should do, but don't.
When you get going, learn to live with failure and keep trying. But equally, don't persist in something that doesn't work.
One of the smartest entrepreneurs I know is an ex army officer who came and worked for me for virtually nothing before setting up his business, which he sold for millions.
So there you are. See you at DraytonBird.com, which is still like a building site, but we'll get there.
Before you read another word, I am not going to sell you a damn thing. I'm just curious, that's all. No: bemused is the right word.
I was talking the other day to a friend who sells a way of finding business prospects on the Internet.
I know it works because we tested it.
I have written about it before, so I won't bore you. However he reckons that for every prospect you now get you could get nine more. All you have to do is spend a little time - I mean minutes - copying and pasting to get it working for you.
So that's a potential 900% more prospects if you can spare a few minutes. And if you don't have enough prospects to chase you'll go broke. But you know what? Most of the people who've asked for a free trial can't be arsed to do it.
People go broke because they're just too damned idle. We had a client not long ago - a well-known firm in financial trouble. We proved that we could transform their business. They just had to give us two pieces of simple information.
It took them two months to supply the first - and so long to supply the second that we gave up and had to sue them to get money they owed.
So now you know why firms go broke. Sheer unmitigated sloth. As the slogan says, "Just do it".
Sorry about the dreadful pun, but it seems to have been raining forever and a day.
Having said that yesterday I visited Glastonbury, where the ever vigilant Chloe who tries to keep me on the right lines comes from.
The day was a joy for many reasons.
To start with, we witnessed a small miracle. The sun shone all the time.
By my reckoning this has only happened once for about ten minutes during this pathetic apology for a summer.
There was lots to look at in Glastonbury. The town is full of slightly dazed-looking folk wandering about in multi-layered, scrupulously mismatched clothes. I couldn't think what they reminded me of, then realised they look as though scooped up in Haight-Ashbury in the '60s and miraculously dumped in this little market town half a century later.
Every other shop is selling bizarre jewellery, fortune-telling, all-round wizardry and any number of loony religious outcrops. I never in my life saw so much mysticism in such a small area. I thought it only polite to get with the programme and in no time at all I was pushing Buddhism prayer-wheels round and making wishes.
Actually I rather like Buddhism. It seems the only major faith that has never thought that slaughtering the unenlightened is a good way to spread the word.
There was a pilgrimage (Christian) going on, too, which we ran into when we went to visit the ruins of the Abbey. The hymns were rather dreary, but you can't have everything. We climbed Glastonbury Tor, where they hanged the last Abbott half a millennium ago.
Perhaps the two best things in the town for a greedy-guts like me are gastronomic.
Burns the Bake sell all kinds of goodies including pasties that are twice as good and half the price of the ones the big chains offer.
A couple of hundred yards away is Knight's who have been around since 1909 and were recently named the best fish and chip joint in the west. We ate in a small sunlit courtyard. Excellent. Their haddock is the size of a small whale.
Back in 1980 I set eyes on the oldest ad I have ever come across in the ruins of Ephesus, in Turkey.
Carved in stone and up to 2,000 years old I guess it is the equivalent of a modern poster.
You could reasonably claim it is a helpful social media message as it gave directions to the local brothel. You might even see it as the ancestor of the kind and helpful emails I get every day from ladies who are just round the corner from my flat, horny as hell and dying for the touch of my manly hand
Those of you with strong views on such matters should stop reading now, but how encouraging to see the ancients advertising something more fun than Coca Cola, McDonalds or Tampax.
Either way, it was wonderfully simple and effective compared to almost all the posters I see today
You may wonder why I often discuss posters.
The reason is simple: it is very hard to devise a good poster. They are a tough challenge - just as banner ads on the internet or classified ads are. So studying them pays
You have to convey a strong, relevant benefit, be simple, dramatic, to the point, include the name of what you are selling and be very brief, as the average poster is only seen for seconds.
Virtually all the posters I see fail on all counts.
They fail to convey a strong benefit and are neither simple, nor dramatic, nor to the point, nor brief - perhaps because those who throw them together have never considered how fast they have to work. In many you can't see the name of the advertiser very quickly.
"We want to look after you well into the future" is the line on a poster near Bristol Temple Meads station.
It is just about possible that a motorist whizzing past might take in all those words, but highly unlikely that they would read the long sentence afterwards which explains why the advertiser thinks they can look after you - which is something to do with an obscure survey they keep topping.
The passing motorist might also be surprised to know that the advertiser - if they ever saw the name - is a power company.
Do you see your power company as looking after you? I think a nurse, or a husband or wife or at a pinch the lady in the Ephesus hospitality suite would be a much more likely candidate.
As it happens there is a lady in the poster wearing what looks like a motor racing helmet. I have no idea what she has to do with gas or electricity. Maybe she is Lewis Hamilton's cousin, lost on her way to one of those confusing Santander bank posters. Her only role is to mystify.
There are only five things to remember about a poster.
Do you remember GIGO - the acronym used in the world of data, computers and so on for Garbage In, Garbage Out.
I have decided that the computer at Lloyds Bank is fed nothing but garbage from morning till night.
Here's why.
I visit the U.S. about five times a year, and have done for the past 12 years or so. I almost always go to the same places - where my son Philip and my daughter Chantal live: Brooklyn and Montclair.
I always need money, so I go to banks' ATM machines, mostly in Montclair or Brooklyn. And at irregular intervals my plea for cash is denied.
Has the art and science of feeding info to computers not reached the stage where they can recognise regular patterns of behaviour? The mystery is that this doesn't happen every time. Just occasionally.
How do banks manage to combine incompetence and rapacity to such an unnatural degree? It really beats all.
All eyes chez Bird are on Italy's progress in the football, but we did buy a second-hand car last weekend.
I got this email this morning. It is an unimpeachable example of total business bollocks.
Note the gripping heading. That'll have them foaming at the mouth for more.
SharePoint 2010 Implementation and Upgrade Super-7
I have recently been working extensively with our key clients who undertaken SharePoint implementations and upgrades in a range of organisation of varying sizes within both the private and public sector. The overwhelming feedback I have received from the hiring managers has been that historically they have found it extremely difficult to find the necessary expertise to fulfil their business objectives. In response to this I have compiled a team of SharePoint 2010 experts who are available and willing to help you maximise the benefit from your SharePoint system. Whether you are looking at implementation, upgrade or maintaining your system – we can provide the expertise to meet your requirements.
I am currently working with experienced contract SharePoint Project Managers, Architects, Consultants, Developers, System Administrators, and Test Analysts and below are a selection of the screened and referenced candidates I am currently exploring new opportunities with. To book an interview with any of these candidates, contact me on 01628 771 811 – if you have another requirement that we can assist with, call me for a frank discussion as to how Ninesharp can help you deliver on your business objectives.
Ok, after I wrote that, I went online to see if I could find out.
And, lo and behold, there is an explanation at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s12Jb5Z2xaE.
This was given 11 years after the thing was first launched. A bit late.
I commend it to you not because it explains what SharePoint is, nor because of the astonishingly irritating voice used, but because of the very funny comments about the sexuality of the protagonist, an androgynous creature called Monique.
SharePoint is a Microsoft thingy, which may explain a lot - starting with the confusing name (I thought it was some sort of incentive programme).
But these comments illuminate the vast chasm between the people who make and sell these things - which are generally called "solutions" and the normal human beings they try to sell them to.
Having said that, here is a serious point.
If people fail to explain what they sell in plain English, they will either fail or do far less well than they deserve. A lot of very good ideas - this seems one - get buried alive beneath a suffocating mountain of linguistic garbage.
I cannot leave this subject without directing you (YAWN) to
http://draytonbirdcommonsense.com/b2b-letter-webinar - the free seminar I put up yesterday for anyone who is interested in how to sell complex stuff to business people.
This was sent to me by Richard Hanrahan in April on Facebook. I only just saw it.
That's because no matter how "social" Facebook fondly thinks it is, I read messages sent me directly every day - not ones sent indirectly, which I look at once every three months. It is a message from Werner Herzog to his cleaner.
I doubt if she appreciated it, but I do. And so will you if you like good writing. Though I think the second sentence in the last paragraph but one is a mess.
Rosalina. Woman.
You constantly revile me with your singular lack of vision. Be aware, there is an essential truth and beauty in all things. From the death throes of a speared gazelle to the damaged smile of a freeway homeless. But that does not mean that the invisibility of something implies its lack of being. Though simpleton babies foolishly believe the person before them vanishes when they cover their eyes during a hateful game of peek-a-boo, this is a fallacy. And so it is that the unseen dusty build up that accumulates behind the DVD shelves in the rumpus room exists also. This is unacceptable.
I will tell you this Rosalina, not as a taunt or a threat but as an evocation of joy. The joy of nothingness, the joy of the real. I want you to be real in everything you do. If you cannot be real, then a semblance of reality must be maintained. A real semblance of the fake real, or "real". I have conquered volcanoes and visited the bitter depths of the earth's oceans. Nothing I have witnessed, from lava to crustacean, assailed me liked the caked debris haunting that small plastic soap hammock in the smaller of the bathrooms. Nausea is not a sufficient word. In this regard, you are not being real.
Now we must turn to the horrors of nature. I am afraid this is inevitable. Nature is not something to be coddled and accepted and held to your bosom like a wounded snake. Tell me, what was there before you were born? What do you remember? That is nature. Nature is a void. An emptiness. A vacuum. And speaking of vacuum, I am not sure you're using the retractable nozzle correctly or applying the 'full weft' setting when attending to the lush carpets of the den. I found some dander there.
I have only listened to two songs in my entire life. One was an aria by Wagner that I played compulsively from the ages of 19 to 27 at least 60 times a day until the local townsfolk drove me from my dwelling using rudimentary pitchforks and blazing torches. The other was Dido. Both appalled me to the point of paralysis. Every quaver was like a brickbat against my soul. Music is futile and malicious. So please, if you require entertainment while organizing the recycling, refrain from the 'pop radio' I was affronted by recently. May I recommend the recitation of some sharp verse. Perhaps by Goethe. Or Schiller. Or Shel Silverstein at a push.
The situation regarding spoons remains unchanged. If I see one, I will kill it.
That is all. Do not fail to think that you are not the finest woman I have ever met. You are. And I am including on this list my mother and the wife of Brad Dourif (the second wife, not the one with the lip thing). Thank you for listening and sorry if parts of this note were smudged. I have been weeping.
Your money is under the guillotine.
Herzog.
***
From the sublimely droll to the boringly practical:
Tomorrow, all being well (which it may not be as I am off to London for some frolics) I shall put up a free 25 minute webinar on copywriting to sell to businesses.
You may find it helpful.
But then again, you may not.
Mark Twain said the principal task of each new administration is to make the last one look good.
But that's enough about Mr. Cameron. Let us turn instead - if we can without laughing - to his shopping "Czar" Mary Portas. She is the woman who calls herself the Queen of Shops - the one who's going to "regenerate the high street", remember?
Since this is impossible she has written a report. Like all these wretched people she has a vision. The vision will not help, because she cannot wave a wand and make three things vanish. They are the Internet, shopping malls and supermarkets.
I too have a vision, part of which came to me yesterday when I was walking down School Road - the high street in Sale, Manchester where I lived as a child. I remember walking down there on a sunny day, holding my mother's hand. I must have been about five.
Just past the station the road becomes Northenden Road - and 30 yards on there's a Wetherspoon's pub, the J. P. Joule. If you ever want to see a heart-warming selection of eager strumpets go there on a Thursday night. But I digress, because in the pub are old photographs showing Sale before it was decreed that shopping is good for you.
You'd never believe it, but there were far fewer shops. People used to live in houses on each side of these streets, and there was a rather agreeable serenity as a result. I do not think it will be a national disaster if this happens again.
Nor do I think it will be a disaster if people decide there is something better in life than working harder and harder in boring jobs to make more money to buy stuff you can probably manage without.
If I were a preacher I would preach the Gospel of Less.
I think we need fewer laws - the ones we have had for centuries if carefully applied will do just fine. I think we need less government and fewer ministers with silly titles like Minister for Sport and Minister for Culture. Shakespeare, Dickens and Stanley Matthews did just fine without some ass presiding.
We need fewer enquiries, committees, consultants and money wasted by government. Which reminds me: we would get by with fewer broken promises from people like Cameron - sorry to mention him again, but he is such fraud.
I am sure we need less tax and lower top rates. But equally sure that my old boss Martin Sorrell doesn't really need over £16 million a year to rub along.
I also keep thinking it must be possible to reorganise one thing that seems insane. One part of the nation is working like mad in what they used to call private enterprise to pay the other half who work in what they call the public sector.
Many of these people hate their jobs. Many of the jobs involve managing all the other needless stuff that's been foisted on us. Take our tax system. Did you know it's the most complicated in the world? An entire department is devoted to explaining it. Can working at something so stupid be satisfying in any way?
Maybe people trapped in such ghastly jobs would like to migrate to our side of the fence. There would be fewer of them to pay and more doing useful stuff - so we would all have to work far less.
It makes sense to me, but there you are.
Who first said "less is more"?
To my surprise I see the poet Browning wrote it in a poem about the painter Andrea del Sarto.
But I bet someone in Greece said it earlier.
Two kinds of charity raise money in this country no matter how inept they may be. Those devoted to cancer, and those devoted to animals.
I have two problems this weekend.
First I have to edit some stuff about horses.
Second, being forgetful and busy I haven't got round to it. So I asked a colleague to remind me.
For some time I had heard people say Robert Peston of the BBC was an extremely irritating individual.
He did a programme early this week about the great European catastrophe, and I can see what they meant.
As he strode about the ruins of Rome in an ill-fitting overcoat (why can't these buggers keep still?) he gave out a sort of spurious enthusiasm which did jar a lot. He combined this with the common habit among TV presenters of emphasising certain words for no good reason. But the strong temptation to switch off was more than offset by what he revealed about the mess we're in.
Many people have pointed out the flaws in the European experiment - that a common currency is a straight-jacket; that the various countries are almost uniquely ill-suited to be yoked together; that economic union can't work without political union and so on.
But for the first time he showed in simple language how the politicians deliberately sidelined the safeguards originally built into the Euro experiment.
To get more nations involved and make things look better than they were they relaxed or even removed the good housekeeping requirements. Countries were allowed to get into more debt than they should have; they were deluged with cheap money.
And who connived at concealing what was going on? The banks. They invented derivatives that enabled countries to hide how deeply in debt they were by delaying the need for payment - in effect taking the rubbish off the books for a few years.
Well, here we are. In the shit. The culprits are exactly who you thought they were.
The people who will pay are exactly who you thought they were. too. You and me.
Years ago I did a banner ad to promote racehorse ownership which had a horse galloping across the screen pulling a message. Worked like a charm.
Anyone who knows anything about online advertising is aware that ads with things happening tend to work better than ads where nothing happens.
Large corporate clients tend to hate this sort of thing. Too vulgar. But I recall simply making the prices flash for a posh wine merchant boosted sales over 10%
Here is some more detailed research about the subject.
http://www.marketingmag.com.au/news/rich-display-and-video-ads-boost-purchase-intent-14282/
However, one bit of that article got my goat a little.
"The days of solely measuring online campaign success on a cost per click or lead-generation basis are fading, with these measures indicating engagement with the ad itself rather than its success in improving brand metrics."
All attempts to stamp out phrases like "brand metrics" are to be vigorously encouraged, because they usually indicate an attempt by an agency to avoid being measured on anything more concrete.
At the start of that magnificent all-purpose door-stop, "Commonsense Direct and Digital Marketing" I quoted David Ogilvy's mentor (yes, he had one).
"The only purpose of advertising is to sell. It has no other function worth mentioning" - Raymond Rubicam.
I once did a talk to the Marketing Society called, "The research said it would sell. So how come we went broke?"
So I wouldn't throw the baby out with the bathwater just yet. Whilst measuring on pay per click is a waste of time, measuring on cost of leads, whilst not as good as measuring on cost per sale is better than things like "engagement with the ad". This nauseating expression should be swept into outer darkness, along with brand metrics, core values, mission, vision and almost any phrase including the word strategic - especially if it is a job title. If that title also incorporates the word officer, sudden death should occur.
P.S. If you want to know why ads don't work and how to create ones that do, I still have space at my copy seminar in Bristol a week from today.
I will start with an analysis of 21 ads and posters I saw yesterday. Only one was any good. The rest varied between vaguely OK, useless and pathetic. Many were incomprehensible, most were wasteful, in many the layout actively discouraged readership.
I cannot think of any industry in which so few people are utterly clueless about what they should be doing.
What an opportunity for anyone who does!
And judging by what's happening in Europe, this is a wise time to start doing better. A lot better.
I just wrote to a friend asking why she seems to be forever having holidays in exotic places.
She replied with three words.
“I have tits”.
Years ago when I was young and – relatively – handsome, I was asked to pose for pornographic photographs.
If the thought leaves you torn between nausea and disbelief, I quite understand. Read no further.
I had no objection to the idea in principle – I was quite flattered. But I felt I could never rise to the occasion and refused.
Which leads me to ask: have you been following the big debate about barring porn on the internet?
I bet this would be about as effective as banning prostitution, alcohol or drugs – i.e. create a wonderful new playground for criminals. Mexico is a good example of what happens.
The only research I have seen on the effects of porn suggested that it led to fewer sexual crimes. I can’t find the research - don’t think I downloaded it. But doesn’t it make sense? Porn is a substitute.
However, moodily reflecting on this lost career opportunity, I started listing matters far more obscene.
Children in one part of India starve whilst food is left to rot in another after a bumper harvest. The Children of the Lord in Africa run amok raping and slaughtering their own parents and it takes years and millions to bring the culprit to book. An Italian father jumps off a balcony with his two children – in despair.
On a lesser scale the man who led Aviva down and down is rewarded - with £1.75 million just to leave. And so on.
Yesterday I went through two magazines tearing out examples of appalling advertising to comment on.
How can I possibly be enraged by lousy ads?
I have no sense of proportion.
What have I done with my life?
My colleagues often chide me for announcing stuff, asking people to pay for it, then being astoundingly coy about what they will get in return.
Quite unforgiveable - which reminds me of the headline above.
I saw it in a full page ad which also showed a child's face.
Have you any idea what the headline could be about?
I have yet to read the copy, which is carefully reversed-out to make it hard to read.
But this is one of the many examples I shall be discussing, with barely controlled fury, on my copy day in Bristol.
I shall analyse all kinds of copy in all media and try to explain what makes it work (or not).
In the case of "Stupid is as stupid does" what makes it not work, I imagine, is a total disinterest in what makes good headlines.
My friend Steve Harrison and I will also work with you in your copy for an hour and a half.
And he will be talking with his usual dry wit about the genius Madison Avenue never got hold of - who was fifty years ahead of his time.
You can bring stuff in for comment if you like, and we will be helpful - as we have for many of the world's biggest (and smallest) brands.
Between us I hope we can keep you entertained - and do a pretty good job for you.
In times like these, people tend to batten down the hatches and hope the storm will pass.
It won't, for years. We can help you get more out of your copy.
I know a lot of you read this because you write, and want to write better.
Go and have a look at this: http://tinyurl.com/bqz5zw8.
John, the speaker, is one of the best writers I know. David Ogilvy thought very highly of him.
I shall be doing seminars with John in October in Australia, all being well. He is so damn good I am downright frightened at being compared to him.
If you either a) are unlikely to be in Oz then or b) can't wait that long to write better - well, here's a suggestion.
David Ogilvy also thought highly of two other writers who are running a copy seminar in Bristol in a couple of weeks.
I think I may have mentioned that before.
On the day I shall be analysing all kinds of copy and trying to explain - maybe not as well as John - what makes it work (or not).
And Steve and I will work with you in your copy for an hour and half.
You can bring stuff in for comment if you like.
Between us I hope we can do a pretty good job for you. It will certainly do you a lot more good than the Jubilee which follows immediately afterwards.
Just click here.
A friend manages a business that turns over a few billion, and is the leader in its field.
They do it by charging less, delivering better service and marketing a lot more than their competitors.
The other day he had a phone call.
I have no idea what the caller said so I can only tell you his end of the very short conversation.
Caller: ?
My friend: No, we don't use management consultants.
Caller: ?
My friend: No. We just get on with it.
Over the years I have noticed that the larger the organisation the worse they tend to be at getting on with it.
Also, the people who get to the top become less and less interested in reality.
Don't imagine that the recession changes things.
I just discovered that a client for many years has been paying an agency £750,000 a year in fees to give "strategic and planning advice" and do their advertising and direct marketing.
I nearly fell off my chair. We used to do their direct marketing for under £100,000 a year - and we were never beaten in tests over a seven year period.
The media planning is done elsewhere. So is the digital stuff. They produce one TV ad a year. The direct marketing results are way down, because they can't write letters.
But they are very good at playing golf.
The Marketing Director (a fine golfer) has left for leafier climes; the Managing Director (still working on his swing) has departed.
The reason? Not enough profit.
Anyhow, to depart from these high strategic realms, I just found a 15 minute video of money-making ideas on my computer.
Once upon a time people used to write letters to each other, and some of the finest writing I have ever read resulted.
The email has put a stop to a lot of that.
But to stamp out any lingering inclination to do so, the Royal Mail has put the price of a stamp up to a vertiginous 60p for first class (first class means it will probably get there the next day) and 50p for second, which means it certainly won't.
60p equals about 90 cents US and compares with 44 cents for first class in the U.S.
So, as is so often the case, while private enterprise seeks to do more and more for less and less, public service does the opposite.
To make the point, here is wonderful letter apparently sent to the U.K. passport office, whose "services" are - as you will see - not only useless but bloody expensive.
Dear Sirs,
I'm in the process of renewing my passport, and still cannot believe this.
How is it that Sky Television has my address and telephone number and knows that I bought a bleeding satellite dish from them back in 1977, and yet, the Government is still asking me where I was bloody born and on what date.
For Christ sakes, do you guys do this by hand? My birth date you have on my pension book, and it is on all the income tax forms I've filed for the past 30 years. It is on my National Health card, my driving license, my car insurance, and on the last eight damn passports I've had and on all those stupid customs declaration forms I've had to fill out before being allowed off the plane over the last 30 years, and all those insufferable census forms.
Would somebody please take note, once and for all, that my mother's name is Mary Anne, my father's name is Robert and I'd be absolutely astounded if that ever changed between now and when I die!!!!!!
I apologise, I'm really pissed off this morning. Between you an' me, I've had enough of this bullshit! You post the application to my house, THEN you ask me for my bloody address!!!!
What is going on?? Do you have a gang of Neanderthals workin' there?
Look at my damn picture. Do I look like Bin Laden? I don't want to dig up Yasser Arafat, for Christ sakes.
I just want to go and park my arse on some sandy beach somewhere.
And would someone please tell me, why would you give a toss whether I plan on visiting a farm in the next 15 days? If I ever got the urge to do something weird to a chicken or a goat, believe you me, you'd be the last people I'd want to tell!
Well, I have to go now, 'cause I have to go to the other end of the poxy city to get another bloody copy of my birth certificate, to the tune of £30.
Would it be so complicated to have all the services in the same spot to assist in the issuance of a new passport the same day??
Nooooooooooooo, that'd be too damn easy and maybe make sense. You'd rather have us running all over the sodden place like chickens with our heads cut off.
Then I have to find some idiot to confirm that it's really me on the damn picture - you know, the one where we're not allowed to smile?! (bureaucratic morons).
Hey, do you know why we couldn't smile if we wanted to? Because we're totally pissed off!
Signed
An Irate Citizen.
P.S. Remember what I said above about the picture and getting someone to confirm that it's me? Well, my family has been in this country since 1776 ...... I have served in the military for over 30 years and have had full security clearances over 25 of those years enabling me to undertake highly secretive missions all over the world. However, I have to get someone 'important' to verify who I am - you know, someone like my doctor -
WHO WAS BORN AND RAISED IN BLOODY PAKISTAN!!!
Thanks you David Looke for sending me that. Even if it is made up I can confirm its truth as I just renewed my passport.
In this country public servants get better pay on average than those of us who toil to pay their salaries.
On top of this, many are planning to strike this year because the government wants to bring their pensions (which are far greater than those in the private sector) down a little - but not as low as ours.
I wouldn't mind, but the buggers don't even put in the hours. Yesterday I had to go and pick up a package from the Royal Mail here in Bristol. They close at 12 noon - and that's it. Why?
While I'm on the subject, one of the chief reasons for the problems in Greece and Italy is their colossally bloated and dysfunctional public sectors. Though we mustn't forget that the Greeks are the fourth highest arms buyers in the world - most being sold by Germany and France.